After all, the longest volume in the series, “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” became the shortest film, and parts of the long midsection of “Deathly Hallows”- when the kids sulk in the wild, not knowing what to do next - easily could have been abridged. Rowling’s exceptionally intricate epic is being concluded onscreen is whether dividing the final book into two films was justified artistically or only financially. Perhaps the most pertinent question surrounding the way in which J.K. That this holiday release will be a huge international attraction is beyond question, even if the real fireworks mostly await the finale’s second installment, which arrives July 15. With Harry, Ron and Hermione left largely to their own devices on often forbidding terrain, this grim beginning-of-the-end odyssey has a very different feel from any of its predecessors - a development slightly more disconcerting than it is welcome. Gone are Hogwarts and the sense of security that went with it, gone is any of the joy of youth, gone is more than just a measure or two of John Williams’ original music. LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - The long goodbye for the most successful film series of the century thus far begins with “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1,” the darkest and least characteristic of the batch. Daniel Radcliffe poses as he arrives for the world premiere of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" at Leicester Square in London November 11, 2010.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |